In the unfortunate event of a vehicular accident where a pedestrian is killed, it’s unlikely to consider the potential for the deceased to be at any fault. Sadly, in the case of Wagmeister vs. Simmonds, this circumstance did occur. With a difficult case to both illustrate and prove, John Cirello, Esq. turned to Geomatrix Productions to aid him with this task.
Geomatrix Productions’ animator Tom Coben worked to create an accurate visual representation of what transpired the morning of June 28, 2013.
“Wanting to present his entire argument in the form of a video, John provided us with documents that were far too lengthy, complex, and cumbersome for the visual medium. We worked to create a video that presented the story in a visually concise way.” Tom Coben, Animator Geomatrix Productions
Cirello and Coben were able to prove it was a series of bad decisions on the part of both the driver of the disabled truck, and Mr. Wagmeister himself that ultimately led to his death. The video illustrates that had the correct precautions been taken, this sad course of events could have been avoided. Cirello’s use of the visual medium allowed for his total defense to be heard without disruption.
“The opposing attorney had a simple story to tell, but when you delve into the details it becomes clear there were liability issues. If I had attempted to tell the story in writing, people would stop reading. And, if I had attempted to tell the story verbally, I would have been interrupted. A video has the unique ability to draw people in, and allows you to have your entire story heard.” John Cirello, Esq. Cirello & Vesicchio LLC
Cirello, usually arguing for the plaintiff, found himself on the opposite side of the bench in this case. Regardless, he was adamant that the use of video is both economic and essential in proving a point.
“If you are dealing with a case worth over half a million dollars, you would be a fool not to make a video. When you are talking about those types of numbers, it will cost 1% of the overall settlement to produce a video. It makes no difference whether you are arguing for the side of the plaintiff or the defendant, and nothing tells a story better,” said Cirello.
The case of Wagmeister vs. Simmonds shows how video production can be used to accurately recreate events and communicate a comprehensive argument. The economic value complemented by the unique ability to capture and maintain one’s attention, represent the key benefits video production has to offer in a court of law.Tags: accident, animation, legal